02 · Parliamentary Accountability

Your MP's ₹5 Crore

Every Member of Parliament receives ₹5 crore per year to spend on local infrastructure — roads, classrooms, water pumps — in their constituency. Over a full five-year term, that is ₹25 crore per seat. Here is what actually happens to that money.

🏫 ₹5 crore is enough to build 10 fully-equipped primary school classrooms, every single year.
⚠️
MPLADS Suspended
In FY 2020–21, the Government of India suspended MPLADS for two years and redirected ₹7,900 crore from the scheme to the PM CARES Fund in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The decision was challenged in the Supreme Court. The scheme resumed in FY 2022–23. MPs received no MPLADS allocation during this period. No state-wise or project-level data is available for this year.
The short version
  • Every MP gets ₹5 crore a year for local works — but on average, 15–25% of that money is never spent and gets returned to the government.
  • The gap between funds released and funds actually spent varies enormously by state — from under 5% in Kerala to over 40% in Jharkhand.
  • MPs tend to spend significantly more in election years. Audit reports have found this pattern is deliberate — funds are held back and released when it benefits the MP politically.
Context
MPLADS has been operational since 1993. The per-MP allocation was raised from ₹2 crore to ₹5 crore in FY 2011–12. Works can only be recommended, not directly executed, by MPs; implementation rests with district authorities — this two-step process is the primary source of delays and gaps between released and utilised funds.
Which states spend the most of their MP funds?
₹ crore · states sorted by utilisation rate, best to worst
How to read this: Each state has two bars side by side. The lighter bar is money released (sent to the state). The darker bar is money actually spent on completed works. A big gap between the two means money was released but work never finished.
Released
Utilised (spent on completed works)
Which states lose the most money?
₹ crore released but not utilised · high means more money returned unspent
How to read this: States with longer bars lost more money in absolute terms. States with many MPs (like UP and Bihar) lose more simply because they receive more.
What do MPs spend the money on?
% of sanctioned works by category · national average
How to read this: MPLADS guidelines say water and sanitation should be prioritised. The chart shows whether MPs follow those priorities.
Has MP fund utilisation improved over time?
National average utilisation rate (%) · FY 2015–16 to 2025–26 · suspended years excluded
How to read this: Each point is the percentage of released funds that were actually spent that year. Higher is better. The drop in 2022–23 reflects the restart after a two-year suspension — the pipeline of works had dried up.
Utilisation rate
Election years
State-by-state breakdown
Funds released, amount spent, per-MP average, and utilisation status
How to read this: "Per MP" shows the average each MP in that state spent. Green = good (over 88%), Yellow = moderate, Red = low (under 78%).
State MPs Released (₹ Cr) Utilised (₹ Cr) Per MP (₹ Cr) Utilisation Status

When the money didn't reach

Audit reports and investigative journalism have documented what happens when MPLADS funds lapse, get misused, or arrive too late. These are not hypotheticals — they are on the public record.

CAG Audit Finding · 2010
₹73.76 crore spent on works MPs were not allowed to sanction
A CAG performance audit covering 2004–09 found 2,340 works worth ₹73.76 crore sanctioned on items not permitted under MPLADS rules. A further 775 works worth ₹10.18 crore were sanctioned but never begun — the land was never acquired, the contractor never mobilised. The same audit noted that two previous CAG audits (1998, 2001) had flagged identical problems. Action Taken Notes were submitted 8 years late, in 2009.
Source: CAG Report No. 31 of 2010 — Performance Audit of MPLADS
Pattern of Misuse · Documented 2015, 2018
MPs deliberately hold back funds for the election year
Analysis by Factly and NewsLaundry found a consistent pattern across Lok Sabha terms: MPs underspend in Years 1–4 and rush sanctions in Year 5, the election year. A 2018 Central Information Commission order confirmed this practice after an RTI applicant found MPs had accumulated unspent carry-forward balances far above permitted limits. The pattern shows up clearly in utilisation data — election years consistently show the highest national utilisation rates.
Source: Factly (2015), NewsLaundry (2015), CIC Order (2018)
Scheme Suspension · FY 2020–21 and 2021–22
₹7,900 crore redirected away from constituencies
In April 2020, the government suspended MPLADS for two years and transferred ₹7,900 crore to PM CARES Fund. MPs from all parties lost their constituency development budgets. A petition was filed in the Supreme Court challenging the diversion. The court declined to strike it down but flagged concerns about the scheme's suspension. MPLADS resumed only in FY 2022–23, and the backlog of stalled projects took years to clear.
Source: Ministry of Statistics, Supreme Court petition WP(C) 686/2020
Infrastructure Quality · Bihar, June 2023
13 bridges collapsed in Bihar in 18 days
In June 2023, a wave of bridge failures hit Bihar — 13 in 18 days, including the ₹1,710 crore Aguwani–Sultanganj bridge over the Ganga which had already collapsed once in April 2022 and was still under construction. While not all were MPLADS-funded, the Bihar series exposed systemic quality failures in government-sanctioned infrastructure: use of substandard materials, ignored seismic testing requirements, and awards to the lowest bidder with no quality verification. MPLADS works face the same L1 (lowest-bid) contractor system.
Source: CNN (June 6, 2023); National Herald India; CAG construction quality reports
Unutilised Funds · December 2020
₹1,750 crore sitting idle right before the scheme was suspended
As of December 2020 — just before the scheme was suspended — over ₹1,750 crore in MPLADS funds sat unutilised across constituencies. Carry-forward balances had built up over years. Some MPs had never even submitted work recommendations for entire financial years. When the scheme was then suspended and funds redirected, these unspent constituency development balances were lost entirely — the communities they were meant to serve received nothing.
Source: Factly — "₹1,750 crore of MPLADS funds unutilised as of December 2020"
Systematic Pattern · CAG State Finances 2025
States bunching expenditure in March — the same problem, at scale
A January 2025 CAG report on state finances found that 15 states plus Delhi exceeded the Union Finance Ministry's mandated caps on year-end spending: no more than 10% of the annual budget in March, no more than 25% in the final quarter. Multiple states spent 30–45% of their annual budgets in March alone. The CAG noted this "fiscal imprudence" leads to sanctioning works without proper planning, creating the same quality and lapse problems seen in MPLADS at a far larger scale.
Source: CAG Report No. 1 of 2025 — State Finances for 2023–24
Data Sources & Access
MoSPI MPLADS Portal
mplads.mospi.gov.in →
Official portal with MP-wise, state-wise, and project-level data on releases, expenditure, and completion status. Includes annual reports and scheme guidelines.
data.gov.in — MPLADS Datasets
data.gov.in/keywords/MPLADS →
Downloadable datasets from the Open Government Data platform. Search "MPLADS" for state-wise and year-wise structured data.
CAG Performance Audit — MPLADS
cag.gov.in →
CAG has conducted performance audits of MPLADS, including findings on lapsed funds, non-utilisation, and quality of works. Search "MPLADS" in the audit report repository.
Methodology Note
Multi-year data is indicative, based on published MoSPI MPLADS annual reports and patterns. State-level figures are scaled from FY 2023–24 base data using year-level national utilisation rates with proportional adjustment. Utilisation rate = (amount utilised on completed works) ÷ (funds released). "Absolute lapse" = released − utilised. Per-MP average = utilised ÷ number of MPs. MPLADS was suspended in FY 2020–21 and FY 2021–22; no constituency data is available for those years. Source: MoSPI MPLADS Annual Reports; CAG Performance Audit No. 31/2010; CAG Report No. 1/2025; Factly; NewsLaundry.
More Studies